The
Church was a new phenomenon in the Roman Empire. Christians had exploited the
empire’s improved communications to create an institution with a unity of
structure that none of the other faith traditions had attempted by the third
century. Each local church was headed by a bishop, the “overseer” who was said
to derive his authority from Jesus’s apostles, and was supported by presbyters
and deacons. The network of such near-identical communities seemed almost to
have become an empire within the empire.
Irenaeus,
the bishop of Lyons (c. 130-200), who was anxious to create an orthodoxy
that excluded aggressive sectarians, had claimed that the Great Church
had a single Rule of Faith, because the bishops had inherited their
teaching directly from the apostles. This was not only a novel idea but a
total fantasy. Paul’s letters show that there had been considerable tension
between him and Jesus’s disciples, and his teachings bore little relation to
those of Jesus. Each of the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Luke & Mark) had
its own take on Jesus, while John was different from them. In addition, at that
time there were also a host of other gospels in circulation that were used in
churches. When Christians finally established a scriptural canon (New Testament)
— between the fourth and sixth centuries (centuries after the crucifixion) — the
diverse visions of the authors of those books were included side by side. After
that it would be up to Church authorities, theologians and councils to try an
reconcile long-held differences between those ancient sources.
Unfortunately,
however, some in powerful positions in Christianity would develop a peculiar
yearning for intellectual conformity that would not only prove to be unsustainable
-- but that set it apart from other faith
traditions. It also laid the foundation for endless disputes that continue
to this very moment.
(Primary
Source: Fields of Blood: Religion and the
History of Violence by Karen Armstrong © 2014; Anchor Books; New York, NY;
pp. 150-151.)
Comments
Post a Comment