Friday, May 22, 2015

Rabbi Stephen S. Wise’s Sermon at Synagogue on Jewish Jesus Causes a Storm

Rabbi Stephen S. Wise gave this sermon in late December 1925 and it set off a storm of protests in Jewish communities. 

“Jesus of Nazareth is not a myth as He has been pictured in Hebrew teachings, but was a man . . . The very foundations of morality are contained in the unparalleled code of ethics which comprises the teachings of Jesus.”

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

The Salvation Message of the Real Yeshua

What must one do to be saved? The answers to that question reveal the answer to another question – What does it mean to be a “Christian?” – that have been given over the past 2,000 years. Interestingly, the one answer that I have not been able to find among all of those is the answer given by the Real Yeshua. Why?

Have you ever worked on your genealogy?  I have been the family genealogist for a long time and love searching for and finding ancestors. I want to introduce you to a new term – memealogy or memeology. Remember this word because in the very near future it is going to revolutionize the way you understand Belief Systems.

In 1976 Richard Dawkins introduced the world to “memes” in his book The Selfish Gene. To emphasize commonality with genes, Dawkins coined the term "meme," which comes from a Greek word[i] that means "something imitated."[ii]

A meme is a unit of information in a mind whose existence influences events such that more copies of it are created in other minds.[iii]  A gene is the unit of genetic heredity and a meme is the unit of memetic heredity.[iv] Memes are units of information that exist only in the human mind.

Memes are the thoughts we share with others that are reproduced in their minds. They have histories which can be traced just like genes. They also evolve as they are passed from mind to mind and when we place this information in chronological order it paints a very interesting picture. If you haven’t read my earlier blog – How We Received the Words of Jesus – I recommend that you take time to read it and study the two graphics before you continue.

Before I discuss Yeshua’s salvation message, it is important for you to understand the following:

(1) He was speaking to a Jewish audience.

(2) He was speaking to them about a Jewish subject they completely understood.

(3) It was a message for Jews about their salvation.

(4) It was not a message to non-Jews about their salvation.

Now let’s look at Yeshua’s salvation message. Every Christian probably knows the following words very well – they just don’t understand that it was Yeshua’s salvation message. His message is found in Matthew 25:31-46 (the format will be different from your Bible):

Narrator:         When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory and before him shall be gathered all nations. He shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. He shall set the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left.

Narrator:         To those on the right:

King:               Come, you (plural) blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food to eat. I was thirsty and you gave me a drink. I was a stranger and you invited me in. (I was) naked and you clothed me. I was sick and you visited me. I was in prison and you came to me.

Right:              Master, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and gave you a drink? When did we see you (as) a stranger and took thee in, or naked and clothed you? Or when did we see you sick or in prison and came to you?

King:               Amen! I say to you, inasmuch as you have done it to one of the least of these my brothers, you have done it unto me.

Narrator:         To those on the left:

King:               Go from me you cursed into the eternal fire, having been prepared for the devil and his angels, because I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat. I was thirsty and you gave me no drink. I was a stranger and you did not take me in; naked and you clothed me not; sick and in prison, and you did not visit me.

Left:                Master, when did we see you hungry, or thirsty, or as stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister to you?

King:               Amen! I say unto you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.

Narrator:         The ones on the left shall go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous (ones on the right) shall go into life eternal.

What did the ones on the right do that those on the left did not do?

(1) Gave food to those who were hungry.

(2) Gave drink to those who were thirsty.

(3) Gave shelter to a stranger.

(4) Provided clothes for those who needed clothing.

(5) Visited those who were sick.

(6) Visited those who were in prison.

Those who did the above things entered into eternal life, while those who did not went away into eternal punishment. The people on the right were saved from eternal punishment during the Great Day of Judgment. A lot of people leave off the ending – eternal punishment or eternal life -- and mistakenly view the message as a poverty program.

But Yeshua and his Jewish audience understood that these are not merely humanitarian acts. They are rooted in the divine command to love Yahweh. Each act done by those on the right was an act of SHALOM – a subject that was well known by the Jewish audience.

Yeshua -- “Blessed are the SHALOM makers, for they will be called sons of God. Blessed are those who purse TZEDAQAH (righteousness), for they are the kingdom of God.”[v]

Hillel -- “Be of the disciples of Aaron, loving SHALOM and pursuing SHALOM, loving your fellow-creatures, and drawing them near to the Torah.”[vi]

Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel“On three things the world is sustained: on truth, on judgment, and on SHALOM, as it is it says (Zechariah 8:16): `Speak the truth to one another, render in your gates judgments that are true and make SHALOM.’"

SHALOM is usually translated “peace,” which English speakers interpret to mean “the absence of war or strife.”  The Hebrew word SHALOM means something very different.

SHALOM is the state of wholeness and completeness.[vii]

The three quotes above agree that SHALOM is God’s highest priority.  “Making SHALOM” means “make the lives of people you encounter in your daily life whole and complete when you see they are not whole and complete.” A hungry person’s life can be made more whole and complete when you give him or her food. The list of things Yeshua gave in his message – food, water, clothing, etc. – doesn’t mean that these are the only things that people will be judged for. His audience clearly understood the message to mean that when one becomes aware of a lack of wholeness and completeness in the lives of others – make SHALOM!

They also knew that Yeshua was simply repeating a lesson that is found throughout the Jewish Scriptures and that “making SHALOM” was synonymous with “love.” It should also be noted that the Bible taught people to do acts of “love,” even when the word “love” itself does not appear in the text – and love isn’t done just for one’s friends.

If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat; if he is thirsty, give him water to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head, and Yahweh will reward you. (Prov. 25:21)

If you meet your enemy’s ox or his donkey (which has) gone astray, you shall bring (it) back to him. If you see the donkey of one who hates you lying under his burden, you shall refrain from leaving him with it, you shall help him lift it up. (Ex. 23:4).

It is precisely in such deeds of love that the command to love Yahweh and love your neighbor can be seen in a proper perspective – love is the norm that the Creator expects of the creatures He made in His image.

After the crucifixion something new happened to Yeshua’s movement – non-Jews learned about it and wanted to join it. Pay close attention to the account recorded in Acts 15:1-21 (Jacob is the brother of Yeshua who is usually called “James”):

Narrator:         And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brothers.

Judeans:          Unless you are circumcised after the manner of Moses, you cannot be saved.

Narrator:         Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and arguments with them (the brothers) and determined that Paul, Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question. And being sent on their way by the congregation, they passed through Phoenicia and Samaria telling in detail the conversion of the nations, and caused great joy to all the brothers. And when they came to Jerusalem, they were received by the congregation, apostles and elders. They reported what God did with them.

Narrator:         Some of the ones from the sect of the Pharisees who believed stood up.

Pharisees:       It is necessary to circumcise them, to command them to keep the Law of Moses, and for the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.

Narrator:         There was a great deal of arguing.

Peter:              Men and brothers, you understand that from the old days, God chose among us, that through my mouth the nations should hear the word of the gospel, and believe. And God, who knows the hearts, witnessed to them giving them the Holy Spirit, as he did unto us; and put no distinction between us and them, by faith purifying their hearts. Now therefore, why do you test God, to put a yoke on the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But through the grace of the Master Jesus we believe to be saved in the same was as those also.

Narrator:         Then all the multitude kept silence, and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul, declaring what miracles and wonders God had worked among the nations through them.

Jacob:              Men and brothers, listen to me. Simeon has declared how God at the first did visit the nations, to take out of them a people for his name. The words of the Prophets agree, as it is written:

After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up, that the rest of men might seek after the Lord, and all the nations, upon whom my name is called, says the Lord, who does all these things.

Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world. Wherefore my sentence is:

We trouble not the ones from among the nations who are turning to God. But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, from fornication, from things strangled, and from blood, because Moses from ancient generations has in every city the ones proclaiming him, being read in the synagogues every Shabbat.

Keep in mind that purpose of this meeting was to answer this question -- What must non-Jews do to be saved? The members of Yeshua’s movement who were also Pharisees argued that they must be circumcised, which meant the non-Jews must convert and become Jews. Jacob, as the leader of Yeshua’s Movement ruled that the only requirements that should be placed on non-Jews are these:

(1) abstain from pollutions of idols

(2) abstain from fornication

(3) abstain from (eating) things strangled

(4) abstain from (eating) blood

(5) keep the Shabbat

Most people miss the last requirement, but in Greek it is clear from the statement “because Moses from ancient generations has in every city the ones proclaiming him, being read in the synagogues every Shabbat.” This reveals another interesting point about conversion to Judaism. Before anyone can convert to Judaism, they must be taught about Judaism and demonstrate they understand they lifestyle they will be living as a Jew. This is reflected in Jacob’s decree – the non-Jews will be attending a synagogue every Shabbat and hearing the Law of Moses read and discussed. I have little doubt that he expected many of them to convert when they understood the Law of Moses that Yeshua taught and lived. They would also understand what his salvation message meant.

Many of the non-Jews that were showing up were followers of Paul, a man that declared that he had received the only true Gospel from Yeshua after the crucifixion – a Gospel that no other apostle had been given. He also declared that he had also been appointed to be an apostle – even though no other apostles knew anything about it. The new meme he introduced was his salvation message – one must believe that it was through the resurrected that Yeshua became the Christ. Paul replaced the requirement for salvation -- “making SHALOM” -- with “believing what he said about Yeshua.” In other words, “right beliefs” replaced “right acts.” The Real Yeshua would not have agreed with Paul!

New memes would emerge over the next 2,000 years. Keep in mind that these were not part of the Real Yeshua’s message, but many became requirements for “salvation” in Christian churches (the number is the year they appeared). I will also switch to the term “Jesus Christ”:

● 325 – Jesus Christ and God are from the same substance.

381 – There is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church. 

● 418 -- The Doctrine of Original Sin adopted.

● 451 -- The Doctrine of the Trinity adopted.

● 1215 -- There is only one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.

● 1525 -- The Bible is the only inspired and authoritative word of God; the only source for Christian doctrine; and, it is accessible to all. The Bible requires no interpretation outside of itself. Justification, being declared right by God and saved, is received by faith alone, without any mixture of or need for good works. Salvation comes only by God's grace or "unmerited favor." Salvation is accomplished solely through His will and action and those who will be saved were determined at the time of the creation.

1560 -- God saves every person upon whom he has mercy, and that his efforts are not frustrated by the unrighteousness or inability of humans; people are not by nature inclined to love God but rather to serve their own interests and to reject the rule of God; God has chosen from eternity those whom he will bring to himself; and, atonement is intended for some and not all.

1600 -- Rejected the pre-existence of Christ; Jesus Christ did not exist until he was conceived of the virgin birth; humans are created mortal in the beginning and would have died naturally whether Adam and Eve had eaten from the tree or not; rejected the doctrine of original sin; rejected the view that the death of Jesus was the atonement of sin; God's omniscience was limited to what would definitely happen and did not apply to what might happen).

1610 -- Salvation and condemnation enabled by the faith or unbelief of man; the Atonement is limited to only those who trust in Christ; unaided by the Holy Spirit no person is able to respond to God's will; man may resist the Holy Spirit; and, believers are able to resist sin through grace, and Christ will keep them from falling.

1689 -- Once Saved, Always Saved (once persons are truly "born of God" or "regenerated" nothing in heaven or earth "shall be able to separate them from the love of God").

● 1727 -- Free grace, free salvation, free will, the Bible is the very word of God without error in all that it affirms, conditional eternal security, voluntary tithing, totally abstention from alcoholic beverages, no work on Sunday, and rejected the doctrine of "once saved always saved."

● 1727 -- The Bible is the inspired word of God; there is One God eternally existing as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; salvation came by grace through faith in Christ, a free gift bestowed by God on those who repent and believe; Christians should live as brothers; Church is to be separate from the State and committed to peace; a lifestyle of discipleship, good works service and holy living; and, if good works outweighed the bad works God will allows a person to go to heaven.

● 1745 – The distinguishing proof of salvation is a personal religious experience of overpowering emotions.

1895 – The essential requirements for salvation are belief is the Virgin Birth of Jesus Christ, the Atonement of Jesus for human sins, the physical Resurrection of Jesus, the imminent return of Jesus to earth, and the inerrancy of Scripture. 

Literally thousands of answers to the question of salvation have come from Christian leaders and institutions over the past 2,000 years – just look at the Christian memealogy. The question that Christians usually ask after becoming aware of the memealogy is – Where do we go from here? 

My answer is – Why not just do what the Real Yeshua taught? Regardless of what one’s theology is or isn't – if people committed to “making SHALOM” the world will become a better place for many people and the lives of those making SHALOM will be more fulfilled.

Jim Myers

If you found this information useful, please let us know by going to The Real Yeshua Facebook page by CLICKING HERE and “Like it.” 

If you consider this information valuable enough to help me fund my work – take a moment to make a donation now by CLICKING HERE. Any amount will help, no matter how small.

[i] μιμήμα (mimema)
[ii] mnema (mnema)
[iii] Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme by Richard Brodie © 1996; Hays House, Inc., New York, NY; p. 11.
[iv] Virus of the Mind; p. 6.
[v] Matthew 5:9-10
[vi] Avot 1:12

Thursday, May 7, 2015

How We Received the Words of Jesus

Jesus wasn't an American who lived in the 21st century and spoke native English to his audience. He wasn't a Christian and didn't attend a church every Sunday. Based on what we know from the Synoptic Gospels, Jesus was a Jew who lived in the 1st century, spoke Hebrew and Aramaic, practiced Judaism, attended a synagogue every Shabbat and engaged in rituals at the Jerusalem Temple. This is very important information to know when our goal is to linguistically understand the words of Jesus. Read the complete article at --

Accurately Understanding the Words of the Bible

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

My Journey to Discovering the Real Yeshua (Updated)

Jim Myers

My journey to discovering the Real Yeshua began in 1980. I believe that if you know more about my journey it will help you understand what I write in our newsletters, blogs, groups, etc. My approach is very different from how others view this subject – many are either defending their positions or attacking someone else’s. I completely understand both positions and have engaged in both over the years. The problem, from my point of view, is that either of those options usually polarizes people and creates environments that make cooperation and respect impossible. My journey has led me to discover ways that brings people together to more accurately understand the past that has produced the present and to include those facts as they consider their future.

Let me begin by telling you about the two most difficult obstacles that I repeatedly encountered on my journey -- my subconscious mind and my Belief System. The subconscious mind acts like a firewall on a computer and screens out information that does not support the information in its memory -- and we are not even aware of the fact that our subconscious mind is doing it. As an information processor -- the subconscious mind is one million times more powerful than the self-conscious mind.[i] The bottom line is that we are wired to move away from and avoid things that we do not believe or consider to be true – even when what we believe to be true is completely false!

So, when I began this part of my life in 1980, my mind was not a blank slate – it was loaded with information, beliefs and truths I had acquired before. This will give you a quick overview of some of the life experiences that created important memories for me. My father was a nurseryman who loved plants. He was an excellent teacher who taught me how to germinate, cross-pollinate, graft, make cuttings, pot, ball, can and do all sorts of other things with plants and trees. He made me aware of how nature and seasonal cycles affect life. The United States Air Force trained me to be a surgery and radiology technician and was where I witnessed lives being saved and lost. My professional career was in banking and finance.  I am a graduate of the School of Banking of the South at Louisiana State University (Graduate School of Banking at LSU today). I learned about the power of money, how it is created and how it is used to control lives. And, I was raised as a Baptist, required to attend to church every Sunday (morning and evening services) while I lived with my parents, was saved when I was thirteen and after I graduated from high school no longer attended church. These experiences not only produced lots of memories, they also gave me a unique way of understanding many things in life – from the point of view of being an insider – that most people do not have – agriculture, military, medical, banking, and as you will see next, religion. So, as you can see, my mind was not a blank slate in 1980.

1980 – I was at a critical juncture in my life, as the result of a personal crisis; I reexamined my life and made the decision to recommit my life to God. I became actively involved in a nondenominational church and soon felt that I was called to go into the ministry. I enrolled in a Bible College and classes were to begin that September. In August, I purchased a new Bible and while sitting at my kitchen table, I opened it and prayed, “Please show me what I need to know.” Instantly, this came into my mind:

Unless you know how words work you cannot understand one word of the Bible.

My first thought was – What does that mean? Then, I brushed it aside.

1981 – One of my most important beliefs at that time was this:

The Bible – meaning an English translation – is the inerrant and infallible Word of God. Every word is the literal Word of God and the Bible has every answer for every question a person could ever face in life.

This will probably sound strange to those who know me now, but back then I did not know this:

The original words of the books in my Bible were written in Greek or Hebrew – not English!

One of the books we were required to purchase for classes was Strong’s Concordance. It was then that I remembered -- “Unless you know how words work you cannot understand one word of the Bible.” I knew I had to learn more about Greek and Hebrew to understand the words of my Bible. The Bible College didn’t offer any courses, so I enrolled in correspondent courses in Biblical Greek and Hebrew from another Bible school at the same time.

1982 – I discovered a set of interlinear Bibles at the college bookstore that had the Greek and Hebrew texts with English words beneath them and the Strong’s Concordance reference number. It felt like I was in heaven. I love to analyze things. One of my banking skills was analyzing financial statements, so I guess my subconscious mind simply did what it had been trained to do – but did it with biblical texts instead of financial statements. It soon identified a familiar pattern:

Bible translators often had more than one option for translating Greek and Hebrew words. They chose one and rejected others, which their readers never know. And then, sometimes they translate Greek and Hebrew words one way in one verse and another was in other verses.

My Belief System did not like what I was discovering and my subconscious mind was trying to filter out a lot of things that were challenging my beliefs. If it hadn’t been for my desire to understand how words work my Belief System might have won.

1984 – I was now the minister of a church I founded in my home town. It was affiliated with the Bible College and we were one of the first to use cutting edge satellite technology. People enrolled in the Bible College, but attended classes at my church. The satellite network grew to include over a 1,000 churches spread around the world -- my church was #20. Things were going pretty well.

But then I received “the” letter and that changed everything. It was an advertisement for a new book -- Understanding the Difficult Words of Jesus by David Bivin & Roy Blizzard.  Guess which two words in the title jumped out at me – understanding & words. I immediately ordered it. When it came I finished the entire book the same day and added this to my Belief System:

Jesus was a Jew. To accurately understand his words we must view them from the perspective of his Jewish culture. I call this “seeing his words through his eyes.”

I was beginning to understand the importance of the answer to my 1980 prayer, but now I knew I had to really focus on finding out how words worked! The closest university library was at a Seventh Day Adventists university and that was where I decided to camp out until I had the answer. I never dreamed it would be three month camping trip. During the first month, I was literally there when the doors opened, and except for a lunch break, I stayed there for the remainder of the work day. 

Armed with my new information about the Jewish Jesus, my first goal was to learn as much as possible about his Jewish culture. The very first day I discovered the Encyclopedia Judaica -- it was like discovering gold! I spent days studying words like righteousness, sin, repentance, forgiveness, holy, salvation, God, mashiach (messiah), etc. My Belief System was being turned upside down because I believed -- salvation was based on believing IN Jesus, but I was beginning to realize that the Jesus I believed IN wasn’t the Jewish Jesus I was learning about.

This definitely created a BS CrisisBS stands for Belief System. I now knew there were two different figures named Jesus in my mind -- one was a Protestant Christian Jesus and the other was the Jewish Jesus. Later I learned there were many more versions of Jesus out there too. What should I do next? I knew the answer was tied to learning more about how words work. So, I moved from the Jewish section of the library to linguistic section and spent a week there. It was then that I formulated what I call “The Law of Language”:

A word is a symbol or group of symbols with an attached bundle of associations.
Those associations are the product of the Source's culture,
historical time period, geographical location and personal experience.

There are two parties involved in a communications experience are a Source & Receptor.

(1) Source – the one sending the message (author or speaker).

(2) Receptor – the one receiving the message (reader or hearer).

In order for them to have a successful communications experience they must both share the same “bundles of associations” (meanings) for the words of the message. When it comes to words written in the Bible, we can’t go ask the Source what his words mean. It is the responsibility is on the Receptor to do his or her best to learn as much as possible about the Source’s language, culture, geographical location, historical time period, and personal experiences. When I applied this to the Jewish Jesus, this is what I discovered:

(1) symbols -- languages – Hebrew & Aramaic

(2) culture - Second Temple Jewish culture

(3) historical time period -- 6 BCE – 30 CE

(4) geographical locations -- Galilee, Samaria & Judea

(5) personal experiences – a few childhood experiences recorded in Bible, but most adult experiences are related to his activities as a rabbi and teacher

While working on this, a nagging thought sidetracked me. My church was located in a small town with a population of around 25,000 -- and it had over 100 churches. They didn’t work together and most seemed to be in competition against each other. The nagging question was this -- How did the single movement of Jesus produce the hundred churches in my town that never worked together? This required a move over to the history section in the library. The first things I found were the 38 volumes of the Ante-Nicene Fathers (writings of the early church fathers). Reading the writings of Christian leaders from the second through fourth centuries was an eye-opening experience. It didn’t take long to realize that two questions caused a great deal of conflict among early Christian groups:

(1) What was Jesus (God, man or something else)?

(2) What was his mission (save the world, create a new religion, etc.)?

I also discovered Philip Schaff’s eight-volume History of the Christian Church. Something was becoming very clear:

Christianity had consisted of groups that disagreed and were in conflict with one another – and with Judaism – beginning just a few years after the crucifixion of Jesus. As the movement spread from Israel to foreign lands, members from those cultures began to interpret the Greek translations of the words of Jesus based on what those words meant to them long before they heard of Jesus. They knew nothing of his Jewish culture, and many looked down on anything Jewish. A group of new Jesus figures emerged that reflected the cultures of Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, Africans, Babylonians, etc.

1985 – I knew that the information I now needed required more than a trip to the library, so I enrolled in the University of Texas at Arlington and completed classes in Hebrew, Classical Greek, Roman History, Greek History, Linguistics, and others that I needed to fill in the blanks.

1987 -- Dr. Ike Tennison was my professor for one of the courses in Classical Greek. Ike soon became an important partner in my work and a very good friend. Ike made me aware of something else that would change the way I studied the words of my Bible -- there are approximately 5,800 Greek New Testament manuscripts that are currently known.[ii]

Of those 5,800+ Greek New Testament manuscripts, no two are identical. Not only must translators choose which English word they will use as the translation of a Greek on an ancient manuscript – they must decide which Greek word from all of those manuscripts is the one that should be translated.

I also learned that no original manuscript of any of book of the New Testament or Jewish Scriptures exists. The earliest manuscripts of the New Testament books were copied three hundred years or more after Jesus spoke them. He did not write down his teachings. What we have are copies of copies of copies of accounts made by others of what he said and did – thousands of copies!

In addition to discovering that thousands of ancient manuscripts existed, I also discovered that there were other New Testaments that had different books than mine -- other Gospels, Epistles and Revelations. Many had been Scriptures for earlier Christians. My version of the New Testament didn’t appear until the middle of the fourth century and wouldn’t be translated into English for another thousand years.

1988 – Keep in mind that I was still pastoring a church while all of this was going on! It does create a challenge when you are preparing a sermon. It also created some very interesting Bible studies and heated discussions. I realized I needed to come up with a way to defuse these situations and bring people together instead of polarizing them. The first thing realized was that people were not making a distinction between opinions, beliefs, truths & facts. Some people get just as mad over their opinion being challenged as they do over a truth be challenged. So, I asked them to let each other know what they were defending:

An opinion is a judgment not founded on certainty or proof.[iii]

A belief is a judgment in which trust or confidence is placed, although without absolute proof that one is right in doing so.[iv]

A truth is a judgment, proposition, or idea that, in accordance with a standard, is accepted as real or the state of being the case.[v]

This was an eye-opener for many people. We soon realized that we all had standards that we were using that determined the above categories. We also discovered that those standards would produce conflicting truths-- two truths could be polar opposites and still be truths!  This is the way the world operated for tens of thousands of years, but things changed when the Scientific Revolution introduced a new standard -- facts.

A fact has the quality of being actual; something that has actual existence; an actual occurrence [vi] A fact is verifiable.[vii] 

Facts are verifiable by anyone, regardless of their Belief Systems. No matter what one believed about their Bible – the facts are that thousands of manuscripts and many canons exist that different. This was when I created the Guiding Principle for Bible Study:

My beliefs will be large enough to include all of the facts; open enough to be tested; and, flexible enough to change when error or new facts are discovered.

The introduction of facts in our studies and conversations changed things. We all understood these facts:

(1) There are hundreds of English translations of Bibles and they differ.

(2) Jewish, Roman Catholic and Protestant Bibles do not contain all of the same books.

(3) There are thousands of ancient Greek and Hebrew manuscripts for the books in the different Bibles and they differ.

When different positions came forth we identified whether they were opinions, beliefs, truths or facts. We then searched for facts together that are related to our study. Everyone was prepared to consider whatever answer came forth in light of existing facts. This brought members of the group together to look for facts. We wanted to understand the development of the differing positions, instead of blindly defending whatever we believed .

1990 – Shortly after my first grandson was born, I was sitting in my study reading a magazine when I flipped a page and saw this picture:

My eyes locked on the soles of the two little tennis shoes between the two bodies on the left. I assumed the child wearing those shoes was lying between its parents.  I couldn’t take my eyes off the shoes in the picture and then this thought seemed to explode in my mind:

What is so powerful that it would cause a loving mother to place a glass of poison
to the lips of her baby, look into its eyes, and tell it to drink?

This answer immediately followed -- It was her religious belief system!

How had a religious belief become more powerful
than a mother’s instinct to protect the life of her child?

And then I thought about Jim Jones and me – we were both Christians; we were both minister; and, we both used our Bible as the authority for our beliefs. We both did a lot of things that sounded very much alike. How could I make sure I would never do or teach anything that could cost another child its life – like that little child in the picture?

Facts are important, but most of time we base our decisions on beliefs simply because we don’t have the facts. Our minds are belief processing engines that operate most of the time on the powerful subconscious level – completely above the level of our conscious awareness. I knew it was essential for me to become aware of what it was doing, so I began keeping a BS Log to record beliefs that were affecting my life. It was an eye-opening experience. It didn’t take long to discover exactly how much of my life was controlled by my religious beliefs – they affected my relationships with others (believers yes & unbelievers no), how I used my time (going to church, reading my Bible, praying, evangelizing, etc.), how I spent my money (tithing, donating, buying books, etc.) what I believed was right or wrong (according to the unknown standard), and much more. I never realized how powerful my religious beliefs were – but I placed a picture of those little shoes on the BHC website Homepage to make sure I didn’t forget!

It was during this period that I was asked to become chaplain at the local law enforcement center by the sheriff. This brought me in contact with a world that I was completely unaware of before. It also placed me an interesting place, when it came to religion. I was in charge of scheduling where visiting ministers and priests would preach every week in the jail. There were three rooms of male inmates and one for female inmates. I quickly discovered that every Monday there were a lot of requests from inmates that were linked to the previous day sermons. Keep in mind that they were hearing different ministers every week -- Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals, Seventh Day Adventists, Catholic, etc.  The requests were usually questions about which one was right! So, I decided to put the monkey on the visiting ministers’ backs. Instead of sending ministers from the same denominations into the same room, I mixed them up. Now, with Pentecostal, Baptist, Methodist and Seventh Day Adventist ministers standing before them, the inmates could ask them their questions instead of me. The sheriff received more than a few complaints from the ministers and a lot of “thank you notes” from the inmates. He thought it was a good plan, too.

It was also during this period that I co-founded an alcohol and drug rehabilitation program called Helping Open Peoples EyesHOPE! Working on this project was very revealing in many ways. One thing I learned through my research was that most of the inmates in the program began taking drugs between the ages of thirteen and seventeen. This has been a strong motivation for me to be involved in youth sports programs ever since. Another factor that affected a lot of the lives of the inmates was their religious beliefs and the related guilt.

1996 – I read The New Science of the Meme by Richard Brodie and was introduced to “memes.

A meme is a unit of information in a mind whose existence influences events such that more copies of it are created in other minds.

Our brain is like the hardware of a computer and memes are like the software. It is through memes that we assign meaning to things and create strategies and associations related to those meanings. Opinions, beliefs and truths are memes and just like genes they have histories that can be tracked from one generation to the next. Just as we have genealogies, we also have our memealogies too. Understanding this completely changes the way we deal with religious, political and economic conflicts. The first thing everyone around the table must do is – show us your memes!

2010 – I became aware of the TOV Standard. The Hebrew word TOV appears seven times in the first chapter of Genesis – the TOV Standard the Creator used to measure His actions. TOV is usually translated “good” in the Bible, but “good” is a very subjective word that can mean different things to different people. Below is the contextual meaning of TOV:

For something to be TOV it must protect life, preserve life, make life more functional and improve the quality of life.

Once we understand that the above is what “good” meant to the Creator, then we can also understand what RA, which is translated “evil” meant to Him:

For something to be RA it must destroy or harm life, threaten life, make life less functional and diminish the quality of life.

Think about that meaning of evil for a moment. I did and that was when I discover the importance of understanding the Real Yeshua and his message. The name “Jesus” didn’t exists until about the 15th century and that Jesus had been completely severed from the life of the Real Yeshua. His words were not viewed through Yeshua’s Jewish culture and he didn’t teach the importance of the TOV Standard. Religions have been teaching about the other Jesus figures for almost 2,000 years – take a hard look at what kind of world we live in. I believe the time has come for anyone that believes IN Jesus to take a hard look at the Real Yeshua and consider what would happen if he or she did what he taught and use the TOV Standard he used to live by.

I hope this helps you understand me and what’s behind my words. Keep in mind the lessons I learned above as you read my articles, blogs and newsletters. Use them in your studies and in your groups. Know, that if you are a pastor or minister, I understand the challenges you face. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you. If you would like to share your thoughts or comments, please email them to me by clicking here.

If you found this information useful, please let us know by going to The Real Yeshua Facebook page by CLICKING HERE and “Like it.” 

If you consider this information valuable enough to help me fund my work – take a moment to make a donation now by CLICKING HERE. Any amount will help, no matter how small.

Thank you for taking time to read this.

Jim Myers